
The
ISU Congress adopted the new ISU judging system in June
2004.
The
use of new system began during the 2004-05 season at
all ISU championship events, including synchronized
skating, as well as the ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating
Series and the ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating
Series. For (2005-06) usage of the new system is mandatory
for all ISU events, international competitions and the
Olympic Winter Games.
All
Puerto Rican National Championships will use the ISU
Judging System
Skaters/Coaches
and the ISU Judging System
Have a question?
Have a question about the new judging system? Coaches
can get answers in a timely manner from other coaches.
E-mail info@prfsf.com
Please include your name and contact information.
Skater can also have their questions answered quickly!
E-mail info@prfsf.com to
find the answers you are looking for.
The
implementation of the new judging system marks one of
the most dramatic changes ever in figure skating. Although
the new system is a tremendous improvement, it still
needs work. Having competed in both singles and pairs
with the new system, I believe that figure skating is
progressively moving in the right direction. The new
system favors more interesting and complex programs,
while still placing emphasis on the artistic side. —
Jennifer Don, U.S. Team member, singles and pairs
Staying
informed of new rule changes and program information
that could affect your performance is imperative. The
requirements of the new judging system have led to some
revisions in the well-balanced free skate requirements
for junior and senior singles and pairs. Moreover, ice
dancing is also affected as technical specialists and
judges interpret the standards set by the new system.
The
"Clarification/Rule
Interpretations" area is your
key to understanding new rule changes that might affect
your future performances. It's suggested that all skaters
and coaches at this level print off a copy of the sheet
(it's available as a PDF file) and use it as a reference
when building programs. Knowing these rule changes can
make the difference in your score at upcoming events.
How the New ISU Judging System
Works
The information on this page is intended as a general
overview of the ISU new judging system to help you understand
the basics of the system. The PRFSF will utilize the
system at our 2005 National Championships this information
should be viewed as an overview for the system in international
competitions only.
For
more information on the ISU judging system visit the
ISU web site at www.isu.org.
They provide links to all ISU documents that delve deeply
into the system, including grades of execution, levels
of difficulty, etc.
How
the New System Differs from the 6.0 System
The new system is based on cumulative points rather
than the 6.0 standard of marks and placement. It is
different from the 6.0 system in many ways, including
the addition of new officials involved in the process
and the way scores are tabulated and displayed.
Under the new system, points
are awarded for a technical score combined with points
awarded for five additional components — skating skills,
transitions, performance/execution, choreography/composition
and interpretation. The exception to this is ice dancing,
which also uses one additional component — timing. In
the new system there are no penalties or deductions
(except program length and other violations). If a skater
performs more than the defined “well-balanced program”
elements, there are no deductions, but the values of
additional elements will not be calculated into the
skater's score. If a skater performs less than the required
elements, they receive less points, not deductions.
The new system focuses
on the skaters and not the judges. Judges no longer
have to use their memory to compare all aspects of every
skater and figure out where to place them, but they
simply evaluate the qualities of the performance. Starting
order does not impact a skater's score; in the old system
starting early typically kept skaters' scores lower
than if they had performed later in the competition.
A skater can win coming from a much lower position as
well — they no longer have to count on another skater's
mistakes to climb the standings.
The
Players
At all 2005-2006 season ISU competitions, there will
be a technical panel with five people who work as a
team and have direct communication with each other.
In real time as the skater
performs, the technical specialist will identify
the element the skater is performing and the level of
difficulty of the element, if applicable (for a spin,
for instance). The level of difficulty of certain elements
is defined by the new judging system. The work of the
technical specialist allows the judge to concentrate
on marking the quality of each element. All technical
specialists are national and international skaters or
coaches involved in skating on a regular basis.
The technical controller,
and a second technical specialist, support the
primary technical specialist to ensure that any potential
mistakes are corrected immediately. Any element can
be reviewed by either the technical controller, the
technical specialist, the assistant technical specialist
or the judges. All final decisions made on elements
and levels will be made from the majority opinion of
the three technical positions. Each of these people
will be recorded with an audio tape during each program,
and video tape will be available to verify the calls.
The elements are available for review after a skater's
performance and scores can be changed accordingly. Review
is over and scores are final once they are posted and
announced to the public.
Under the new system, the
judges focus totally on scoring the quality of each
element and the five program components. Their marks
will be based on specific criteria for each element
and will provide a comprehensive assessment of each
skater's skills and performance. The computer will keep
track of comparative scores, record results and calculate
totals to determine rankings.
Technical
Score
In the technical score, each element of a skater's program
is assigned a base value. A group of experts, including
experienced skaters and coaches, have determined the
element base value of each technical element. These
element base values give the skaters credit for every
element they perform.
Some elements such as spins
and footwork sequences have been assigned a level of
difficulty. These elements are assigned their base value
depending on the level of difficulty. This means that
once the competition is over a skater will see that
a difficult spin performed well receives more points
than an easier spin.
During the program, judges
evaluate each element within a range of +3 to -3. (Note:
this is not necessarily 1, 2 or 3 “points,” but rather
the judges give 1, 2 or 3 + or - grades, which work
out to a calculated figure to impact the grade of execution.
The + or - numerical values are added to or deducted
from the base value.) The judges' grade of execution
is added to the base value of the element as part of
the determination of the skater's score for that element.
When a skater executes
an element, the technical specialist, monitored by the
technical controller, identifies the element. The judge
then grades the quality of the element. Since a triple
Axel's base value is 10, a skater has the potential
to earn 10 points for that jump, or as little as 4.5.
The sum of all performed elements together with the
grade of execution forms the technical score.
Program
Components (or presentation components)
In addition to the technical score, the judges will
award points on a scale from 0 to 10 with increments
of 0.25 for the program components to express the overall
presentation.
In ladies, men's and pairs,
the following five components are scored in the qualifying
round, the short program and the free skate. In ice
dancing, the following five components are scored in
the original dance and the free dance:
Skating Skills
Definition: Overall skating quality: edge control and
flow over the ice surface demonstrated by a command
of the skating vocabulary (edges, steps, turns, etc.),
the clarity of technique and use of effortless power
to accelerate and vary speed.
Criteria:
- Balance, rhythmic knee action and precision of
foot placement
- Flow and effortless glide
- Cleanness and sureness of deep edges, steps, turns
- Power/energy and acceleration
- Mastery of multi-directional skating
- Mastery of one-foot skating
- Equal mastery of technique by both partners shown
in unison (pairs and ice dancing)
Transitions/Linking Footwork & Movement
Definition: The varied and/or intricate footwork, positions,
movements and holds that link all elements. In singles,
pairs and synchronized, this also includes the entrances
and exits of technical elements.
Criteria:
- Variety
- Difficulty
- Intricacy
- Quality (including unison in pairs and ice dancing)
- Balance of workload between partners (pairs and
ice dancing)
- Variety of holds (not excessive side by side and
hand in hand in ice dancing)
- Conformity to pattern and stop requirements in
ice dancing, original dance only
Performance/Execution
Definition: Performance is the involvement of the skater/couple/teams
physically, emotionally and intellectually as they translate
the intent of the music and choreography. Execution
is the quality of movement and precision in delivery.
This includes harmony of movement in pairs and ice dancing.
Criteria:
- Physical, emotional and intellectual involvement
- Carriage
- Style and individuality/personality
- Clarity of movement
- Variety and contrast
- Projection
- Unison and “oneness” (pairs and ice dancing)
- Balance in performance (pairs and ice dancing)
- Spatial awareness between partners — management
of the distance between partners and management of
changes of hold (pairs and ice dancing)
Choreography/Composition
Definition: An intentional, developed and/or original
arrangement of all types of movements according to the
principles of proportion, unity, space, pattern, structure
and phrasing.
Criteria:
- Purpose (idea, concept, vision)
- Proportion (equal weight of parts)
- Unity (purposeful threading)
- Utilization of personal and public space
- Pattern and ice coverage
- Phrasing and form (movements and parts structured
to match the phrasing of the music)
- Originality of purpose, movement and design
- Shared responsibility in achieving purpose (pairs
and ice dancing)
Interpretation
Definition: The personal and creative translation of
the music to movement on ice.
Criteria:
- Effortless movement in time to the music
- Expression of the music's style, character, rhythm
- Use of finesse* to reflect the nuances of the
music
- Relationship between the partners reflecting the
character of the music (pairs and ice dancing)
- Appropriateness of music in ice dancing, original
dance and free dance
* Finesse is the skater's refined,
artful manipulation of nuances. Nuances are the personal
artistic ways of bringing subtle variations to the intensity,
tempo and dynamics of the music made by the composer
and/or musicians.
Ice Dancing exception, compulsory dance
In ice dancing, the compulsory dance(s) are scored on
only four program components: skating skills, performance/execution,
interpretation (see above), as well as a unique component:
timing.
Timing
Definition: The ability of the couple to skate strictly
in time with the music and to reflect the rhythm patterns
and prescribed beat values of the compulsory dance.
Criteria:
- Skating in time to the music
- Skating on the strong beat
- Skating the prescribed beat values for each step
- Introductory steps (dance starting on the correct
measure of the music)
Totaling the competition score
The technical score is added together to the program
components, which are factored differently for the different
disciplines (see below). Additional points may be awarded
for innovative elements, and deductions will be taken
for rule violations. The result is the segment score.
The sum of all segment
scores (for example, short program plus free skate),
is the total competition score. No segment scores are
weighted, they are simply added together cumulatively
to reach the competition score. The exception to this
is qualifying segments (ladies, men and pairs), which
are factored by 0.25. The skater with the highest competition
score is declared the winner.
Helpful
Links
For more information on the ISU judging
system visit the ISU web site at www.isu.org
|